6.3.1. (see also the extensive listing of "Reasons for Anonymity," which makes many points about the need and uses for strong crypto) 6.3.2. "Where is public key crypto really needed?" - "It is the case that there is relatively little need for asymmetric key cryptography in small closed populations. For example, the banks get along quite well without. The advantage of public key is that it permits private communication in a large and open population and with a minimum of prearrangement." [WHMurray, sci.crypt, 1994-08- 25] - That is, symmetric key systems (such as conventional ciphers, one time pads, etc.) work reasonably well by prearrangement between parties. And of course one time pads have the additional advantage of being information- theoretically secure. But asymmetric or public key methods are incredibly useful when: the parties have not met before, when key material has not been exchanged, and when concerns exist about storing the key material. The so- called "key management problem" when N people want to communicate pairwise with each other is well-founded. - And of course public key crypto makes possible all the other useful stuff like digital money, DC-Nets, zero knowledge proofs, secret sharing, etc. 6.3.3. "What are the main reasons to use cryptography?" - people encrypt for the same reason they close and lock their doors + Privacy in its most basic forms - text -- records, diaries, letters, e-mail - sound -- phone conversations - other --video + phones, intercepts, cellular, wireless, car phones, scanners + making listening illegal is useless (and wrong-headed) - and authorites are exempt from such laws - people need to protect, end to end + "How should I protect my personal files, and my phone calls?" - Personally, I don't worry too much. But many people do. Encryption tools are widely available. - Cellular telephones are notoriously insecure, as are cordless phones (even less secure). There are laws about monitoring, small comfort as that may be. (And I'm largely opposed to such laws, for libertarian reasons and because it creates a false sense of security.) - Laptops are probably less vulnerable to Van Eck types of RF monitoring than are CRTs. The trend to lower power, LCDs, etc., all works toward decreasing vulnerability. (However, computer power for extracting weak signals out of noise is increasing faster than RF are decreasing....tradeoffs are unclear.) + encrypting messages because mail delivery is so flaky - that is, mail is misdelivered,via hosts incorrectly processing the addresses - encryption obviously prevents misunderstandings (though it does little to get the mail delivered correctly) + Encryption to Protect Information - the standard reason + encryption of e-mail is increasing - the various court cases about employers reading ostensibly private e-mail will sharpen this debate (and raise the issue of employers forbidding encryption; resonances with the mostly-settled issue of reasonable use of company phones for private calls-more efficient to let some personal calls be made than to lose the time of employees going to public phones) + encryption of faxes will increase, too, especially as technology advances and as the dangers of interception become more apparent - also, tighter links between sender and receive, as opposed to the current "dial the number and hope it's the right one" approach, will encourage the additional use of encryption - "electronic vaulting" of large amounts of information, sent over T1 and T3 data networks, e.g., backup material for banks and large corporations + the miles and miles of network wiring within a corporation-LANs, WANs, Novell, Ethernet, TCP-IP, Banyan, and so on-cannot all be checked for taps...who would even have the records to know if some particular wire is going where it should? (so many undocumented hookups, lost records, ad hoc connections, etc.) - the solution is to have point-to-point encryption, even withing corporations (for important items, at least) - wireless LANs + corporations are becoming increasingly concerned about interception of important information-or even seemingly minor information-and about hackers and other intruders - calls for network security enhancement - they are hiring "tiger teams" to beef up security + cellular phones - interceptions are common (and this is becoming publicized) - modifications to commercial scanners are describe in newsletters - something like Lotus Notes may be a main substrate for the effective introduction of crypto methods (ditto for hypertext) - encryption provides "solidity" to cyberspace, in the sense of creating walls, doors, permanent structures - there may even be legal requirements for better security over documents, patient files, employee records, etc. + Encryption of Video Signals and Encryption to Control Piracy - this is of course a whole technology and industry - Videocypher II has been cracked by many video hackers - a whole cottage industry in cracking such cyphers - note that outlawing encryption would open up many industries to destruction by piracy, which is yet another reason a wholesale ban on encryption is doomed to failure - Protecting home videos--several cases of home burglaries where private x-rated tapes of stars were taken, then sold (Leslile Visser, CBS Sports) - these general reasons will make encryption more common, more socially and legally acceptable, and will hence make eventual attempts to limit the use of crypto anarchy methods moot + Digital Signatures and Authentication + for electronic forms of contracts and digital timestamping - not yet tested in the courts, though this should come soon (perhaps by 1996) + could be very useful for proving that transactions happened at a certain time (Tom Clancy has a situation in "Debt of Honor" in which all Wall Street central records of stock trades are wiped out in a software scheme: only the records of traders are useful, and they are worried about these being fudged to turn profits...timestamping would help immensely) - though certain spoofs, a la the brilliant penny scam, are still possible (register multiple trades, only reveal the profitable ones) - negotiations - AMIX, Xanadu, etc. + is the real protection against viruses (since all other scanning methods will increasingly fail) - software authors and distributors "sign" their work...no virus writer can possibly forge the digital signature + Proofs of identity, passwords, and operating system use - ZKIPS especially in networks, where the chances of seeing a password being transmitted are much greater (an obvious point that is not much discussed) + operating systems and databases will need more secure procedures for access, for agents and the like to pay for services, etc. - unforgeable tokens + Cyberspace will need better protection - to ensure spoofing and counterfeiting is reduced (recall Habitat's problems with people figuring out the loopholes) + if OH is also working on "world- building" at Los Alamos, he may be using evolutionary systems and abstract math to help build better and more "coherent" worlds - agents, demons, structures, persistent objects - encryption to protect these structures + the abstract math part of cyberspace: abstract measure spaces, topologies, distance metrics - may figure in to the balance between user malleabilty and rigidity of the space - Chaitin's AIT...he has obtained measures for these + Digital Contracts - e-mail too easily forged, faked (and lost, misplaced) + Anonymity - remailing - law avoidance - samizdats, - Smart cards, ATMs, etc. - Digital Money - Voting + Information Markets - data havens, espionage + Privacy of Purchases - for general principles, to prevent a surveillance society + specialized mailing lists - vendors pay to get names (Crest labels) - Smalltalk job offers - in electronic age, will be much easier to "troll" for specialized names - people will want to "selectively disclose" their interests (actually, some will, some won't) 6.3.4. "What may limit the use of crypto?" + "It's too hard to use" - multiple protocols (just consider how hard it is to actually send encrypted messages between people today) - the need to remember a password or passphrase + "It's too much trouble" - the argument being that people will not bother to use passwords - partly because they don't think anything will happen to them + "What have you got to hide?" - e.g.,, imagine some comments I'd have gotten at Intel had I encrypted everything - and governments tend to view encryption as ipso facto proof that illegalities are being committed: drugs, money laundering, tax evasion - recall the "forfeiture" controversy + Government is taking various steps to limit the use of encryption and secure communication - some attempts have failed (S.266), some have been shelved, and almost none have yet been tested in the courts - see the other sections... + Courts Are Falling Behind, Are Overcrowded, and Can't Deal Adequately with New Issues-Such as Encryption and Cryonics - which raises the issue of the "Science Court" again - and migration to private adjudication (regulatory arbitrage) - BTW, anonymous systems are essentially the ultimate merit system (in the obvious sense) and so fly in the face of the "hiring by the numbers" de facto quota systems now creeeping in to so many areas of life....there may be rules requiring all business dealings to keep track of the sex, race, and "ability group" (I'm kidding, I hope) of their employees and their consultants 6.3.5. "What are some likely future uses of crypto?" - Video conferencing: without crypto, or with government access, corporate meetings become public...as if a government agent was sitting in a meeting, taking notes. (There may be some who think this is a good idea, a check on corporate shenanigans. I don't. Much too high a price to pay for marginal or illusory improvements.) - presenting unpopular views + getting and giving medical treatments - with or without licenses from the medical union (AMA) - unapproved treatments - bootleg medical treatments - information markets + sanctuary movements, underground railroads - for battered wives - and for fathers taking back their children - (I'm not taking sides) - smuggling - tax evasion - data havens - bookies, betting, numbers games - remailers, anonymity - religious networks (digital confessionals) - digital cash, for privacy and for tax evasion - digital hits - newsgroup participation -- archiving of Netnews is commonplace, and increases in storage density make it likely that in future years one will be able to purchase disks with "Usenet, 1985-1995" and so forth (or access, search, etc. online sites) 6.3.6. "Are there illegal uses of crypto?" - Currently, there are no blanket laws in the U.S. about encryption. + There are specific situations in which encryption cannot be freely used (or the use is spelled out) - over the amateur radio airwave...keys must be provided + Carl Elllison has noted many times that cryptography has been in use for many centuries; the notion that it is a "military" technology that civilians have some how gotten ahold of is just plain false. - and even public key crypto was developed in a university (Stanford, then MIT)
Next Page: 6.4 Protection of Corporate and Financial Privacy
Previous Page: 6.2 SUMMARY: The Need For Strong Crypto
By Tim May, see README
HTML by Jonathan Rochkind