7.14.1. "Does PGP help or hurt public key methods in general and RSA Data Security Inc. in particular?" - The outcome is not final, but on balance I think the position of RSADSI is helped by the publicity PGP has generated. Users of PGP will "graduate" to fully-licensed versions, in many cases. Corporations will then use RSADSI's products. + Interestingly, PGP could do the "radical" things that RSADSI was not prepared to do. (Uses familiar to Cypherpunks.) - bypassing export restrictions is an example of this - incorporation into experimental digital cash systems - Parasitism often increases the rate of evolution. Certainly PGP has helped to light a fire under RSADSI. 7.14.2. Stealth PGP - Xenon, Nik, S-Tools, 7.14.3. "Should we work on a more advanced version, a *Really Good Privacy*?" - easier said than done...strong committment of time - not clear what is needed... 7.14.4. "Can changes and improvements be made to PGP?" - I consider it one of the supreme ironies of our age that Phil Zimmermann has denounced Tom Rollins for making various changes to a version of PGP he makes available. + Issues: - Phil's reputation, and that of PGP - intellectual property - GNU Public license - the mere name of PGP - Consider that RSA said much the same thing, that PGP would degrade the reputation of public key (esp. as Phil was an "amateur," the same exact phrasing PRZ uses to criticize Tom Rollins!) - I'm not taking a stand here....I don't know the details. Just some irony.
Next Page: 7.15 Loose Ends
Previous Page: 7.13 Problems with PGP, Flaws, Etc.
By Tim May, see README
HTML by Jonathan Rochkind