9.8.1. "What is Digital Telephony?" - The Digital Telephony Bill, first proposed under Bush and again by Clinton, is in many ways much worse than Clipper. It has gotten less attention, for various reasons. - For one thing, it is seen as an extension by some of existing wiretap capabilities. And, it is fairly abstract, happening behind the doors of telephone company switches. - The implications are severe: mandatory wiretap and pen register (who is calling whom) capaibilities, civil penalties of up to $10,000 a day for insufficient compliance, mandatory assistance must be provided, etc. - If it is passed, it could dictate future technology. Telcos who install it will make sure that upstart technologies (e.g., Cypherpunks who find ways to ship voice over computer lines) are also forced to "play by the same rules." Being required to install government-accessible tap points even in small systems would of course effectively destroy them. - On the other hand, it is getting harder and harder to make Digital Telephony workable, even by mandate. As Jim Kallstrom of the FBI puts it: ""Today will be the cheapest day on which Congress could fix this thing," Kallstrom said. "Two years from now, it will be geometrically more expensive."" [LAN Magazine,"Is it 1984?," by Ted Bunker, August 1994] - This gives us a goal to shoot for: sabotage the latest attempt to get Digital Telephony passed into law and it may make it too intractable to *ever* be passed. + "Today will be the cheapest day on which - Congress could fix this thing," Kallstrom said. "Two years from now, - it will be geometrically more expensive." - The message is clear: delay Digital Telephony. Sabotage it in the court of public opinion, spread the word, make it flop. (Reread your "Art of War" for Sun Tsu's tips on fighting your enemy.) - 9.8.2. "What are the dangers of the Digital Telephony Bill?" - It makes wiretapping invisible to the tappee. + If passed into law, it makes central office wiretapping trivial, automatic. - "What should worry people is what isn't in the news (and probably never will until it's already embedded in comm systems). A true 'Clipper' will allow remote tapping on demand. This is very easily done to all-digital communications systems. If you understand network routers and protocol it's easy to envision how simple it would be to 're-route' a copy of a target comm to where ever you want it to go..." [domonkos@access.digex.net (andy domonkos), comp.org.eff.talk, 1994-06-29] 9.8.3. "What is the Digital Telephony proposal/bill? - proposed a few years ago...said to be inspiration for PGP - reintroduced Feb 4, 1994 - earlier versrion: + "1) DIGITAL TELEPHONY PROPOSAL - "To ensure law enforcement's continued ability to conduct court- - authorized taps, the administration, at the request of the - Dept. of Justice and the FBI, proposed ditigal telephony - legislation. The version submitted to Congress in Sept. 1992 - would require providers of electronic communication services - and private branch exchange (PBX) operators to ensure that the - government's ability to lawfully intercept communications is not - curtailed or prevented entirely by the introduction of advanced - technology."
Next Page: 9.9 Clipper, Escrowed Encyption Standard
Previous Page: 9.7 Crypto Laws Outside the U.S.
By Tim May, see README
HTML by Jonathan Rochkind